|
|
|
|
|
|
By Mike Barnett
Editor
Fat
mares wont breed. Fat mares have trouble foaling. Thats the dogma
much of the horse industry has suffered through for years. And its simply
not true, according to Dr. Don Topliff, professor and head of the Agriculture
Division at West Texas State University.
One of the myths that has somehow crept into horse reproduction
is this idea that mares ought to be thin at the beginning of the breeding
season, that you ought to feed them to gain weight. Now that works for
sheep really well, Topliff said recently at the Western Rolling
Plains Mare and Foal Clinic in Guthrie. But what Im here to
tell you is thats not what we need to do. I dont know where
the myth came from, but Im here to tell you its a myth.
One of the most important aspects of getting mares bred is body condition.
Topliff said all femaleshumans, cows, sheep, sowsneed a certain
amount of body fat before they will cycle and reproduce normally.
And if we dont have that fat, then its just not going
to work, he said.
To that end, Texas A&M researchers looked at how body condition affects
reproduction in mares back in the 1980s. A body condition scoring system
for cattle, that showed a big correlation between body condition and reproductive
rates, had already been developed. A similar system was developed for
mares.
Body Condition Scores (BCS) range from 1 to 9. BCS 1 is extremely poor,
emaciated, near death. BCS 1 to 3 are seldom seen if the horses have any
kind of management at all. BCS 4 was where many managers think their mares
should start the breeding season. Anything above a BCS 7, many breeding
managers thought, was simply too fat to breed.
A number of studies, in fact, have shown just the opposite. The first
involved 32 pregnant mares divided up into four groups of eight.
The first group, foaled at a BCS 4, the body condition advocated by many
breeding farms as ideal, and maintained at a BCS 4 for 90 days postpartum,
had a 50 percent conception rate.
The second group, foaled at a BCS 4 and fed to gain weight to a BCS 7
by 90 days after they foaled, had 100 percent conception rate.
The third group, foaled at BCS 7 and then allowed to lose weight during
early lactation to a BCS 4, resulted in a 62 percent conception rate.
And the fourth group, foaled at a BCS 7 and maintained at a BCS 7, had
a 100 percent conception rate.
At first blush, you look at this and say, Thats true.
You bring them in thin and feed them to gain weight. No problem,
Topliff said, referring to the second group that foaled at a low score
and were fed to a high BCS. Now, the rest of the story. To get them
to a Body Condition Score of 4 to 7, in 90 days, took an average of 40
pounds of feed per day.
How many of you want to try to manage a herd of broodmares and feed
that amount of feed? he asked. The risk of doing that in terms
of colic, founder, all those kinds of things, is not something most people
are willing to accept.
Even though we can achieve those reproductive rates going from low
to high, its a very difficult management situation. And its
not necessary. Because if well just bring them in at a 7 to begin
with and maintain them there, we can achieve the same kind of reproductive
rates.
A field trial involving four of the largest commercial horse breeding
farms in the state confirmed the first studys results. Horses were
scored as they came into the farms and results tabulated. They showed:
158 mares, BCS less than 5, 71 percent pregnancy rate.
667 mares, BCS 5 to 7, 92 percent pregnancy rate.
102 mares, BCS greater than 7, 96 percent pregnancy rate.
Also, it took 2.8 heat cycles per conception with those mares BCS 5 or
less, compared to 1.4 cycles per conception of mares with BCS 5 to 7 or
greater than 7.
So our standard recommendation is, for mares that are going to be
nursing a foal, wed like for them to show up at the breeding farm
at a 7 or 7 1/2, Topliff said. For open mares or maiden mares,
theyre not undergoing that kind of stress, we can back that off
to a 6 or a 6 1/2.
But, if you want the best chance of getting your mare in foal, dont
send her to the breeding farm in a body condition score of 5, whether
shes open, maiden, nursing a foal, he continued. It
doesnt matter. You dont have any insurance. Theres no
room for error.
Body Condition
Scores
1. Poor. Animal extremely emaciated. Spinous processes,
ribs, head and hooks and pins projecting prominently. Bone structure of
withers, shoulders and neck easily noticeable. No fatty tissue can be
felt.
2. Very Thin. Animal; emaciated. Slight fat covering over base
of spinous processes, transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae feel rounder.
Spinous processes, ribs, tailhead and hooks and pins prominent. Withers,
shoulders and neck structures faintly discernible.
3. Thin. Fat built up about halfway on spinous processes, transverse
processes cannot be felt. Slight fat covering over ribs. Spinous processes
and ribs easily discernible. Tailhead and individual vertebrae cannot
be visually identified. Hook bones appear rounded, but easily discernible.
Pin bones not distinguishable. Wither, shoulders and neck accentuated.
4. Moderately Thin. Negative crease along back. Faint outline of
ribs discernible. Tailhead prominence depends on conformation, fat can
be felt around it. Hook bones not discernible. Wither, shoulders and neck
not obviously thin.
5. Moderate. Back level. Ribs cannot be visually distinguished
but can be easily felt. Fat around tailhead beginning to feel spongy.
Withers appear rounded over spinous processes. Shoulders and neck blend
smoothly into body.
6. Moderate to Fleshy. Slight crease down back. Fat over ribs feels
spongy. Fat around tailhead feels soft. Fat beginning to be deposited
along the sides of withers, behind the shoulders and along the sides of
the neck.
7. Fleshy. Crease down back. Individual ribs can be felt, but noticeable
filling between ribs with fat. Fat around tailhead is soft. Fat deposited
along withers, behind shoulders and neck.
8. Fat. Prominent crease down back. Difficult to feel ribs. Fat
around tailhead very soft. Area along withers filled with fat. Area behind
shoulder filled in flush. Noticeable thickening of neck. Fat deposited
along inner buttocks.
9. Extremely Fat. Extremely obvious crease down back. Patchy fat
appearing over ribs. Bulging fat around tailhead, along withers, behind
shoulders and along neck. Fat along inner buttocks may rub together. Flank
filled in flush. |
|
|